Search

Posts Tagged ‘file’

I would like to file a complain against a university based in California but without involving lawyers.?

Question by Gina: I would like to file a complain against a university based in California but without involving lawyers.?
I was given false information by the representatives based in California and India. I trusted them to guide me in how to apply for Fall 2011 and for visa. Due to their mistake the I-20 arrived late due to which I was unable to take the visa date on time. I was assured that an extension letter would be provided to me that would delay my entry in the USA by a week. Once I got the visa date I was assured that there won’t be a problem but a couple of days later they informed that I would have to differ my admission to Summer 2011. They laugh whenever I try to call them and they fail to take down my complain. When I ask what is the complains procedure they ask to contact an immigration lawyer or a lawyer in CA. They hang up on me whenever I try to contact them. Even if I give a false name to speak to the person incharge they know who is on the line. Their attitude is not professional and it seems that they must pulled this stunt on someone else as well hence they have the “I CARE A DAMN” attitude. All I want is to lodge a complaint at the university with someone other than the person who the complain is against. They refuse to entertain my request and refuse to give any information. Someone please help me because I don’t want some other student to go through what I have gone through. It is insulting and just not right.

Best answer:

Answer by M. P
Call the BBA
http://www.bbb.org/

Also you could contact their board members and let them know what’s going on. Many people are investing a lot of money in that college. They may help you.

3rd you could contact your local newspapers. This is a good way to get their attention and let them know you are serious.

Last… you may need a lawyer… if nothing else works.

What do you think? Answer below!

1 comment - What do you think?  Posted by - March 31, 2011 at 3:12 am

Categories: Immigration Lawyer   Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

California Personal Injury Lawyers File Lawsuit Against the City of Azusa, California, for Dangerous Conditions of Public Property

California Personal Injury Lawyers File Lawsuit Against the City of Azusa, California, for Dangerous Conditions of Public Property













The Seven Fatal Mistakes That Can Wreck Your California Personal Injury Claim


Los Angeles, CA (Vocus) March 25, 2010

The California personal injury lawyers of BISNAR | CHASE (http://www.BestAttorney.com)] have filed a lawsuit against the City of Azusa, Azusa Pacific University and the operator of a trolley on campus property. The complaint for damages for dangerous conditions of public property and motor vehicle negligence was filed after a February 2008 incident in which Julie Farris, a student at Azusa Pacific University, suffered a severe and permanent brain injury after she was struck by a trolley that was owned by the University while riding her bicycle to class. Julie, the plaintiff in this case, brought the action against the aforementioned defendants. The case is currently pending in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case #KC055075.

Catastrophic Personal Injuries After Trolley Collides with Bicyclist

According to court documents, Julie Farris was riding her bicycle on the 800 Block of East Foothill Boulevard, between Citrus Avenue on the east end, and the West Campus of Azusa Pacific University campus on the west end, on February 19, 2008. A trolley owned by Azusa Pacific University and driven by a university employee, Oscar Armando Galan, struck Julie causing her to sustain catastrophic personal injuries, including a severe and permanent brain injury.

“We allege Julie suffered severe permanent injuries at the hands of both the City of Azusa and Azusa Pacific University, both of which knew the roadway on which Julie was traveling was unsafe for students.” said Brian Chase, a partner at the Los Angeles personal injury law firm, BISNAR | CHASE. “What’s equally disturbing is the fact that both the City and the University knew there had been numerous accidents on the roadway and that the majority of university students were riding against traffic, yet did nothing to warn students or the public about these dangers, and did nothing to fix the roadway.”    

Unsafe Roadways in the City of Azusa

The suit alleges that bicyclists and pedestrians traveling between the east and west campuses of Azusa Pacific University were forced onto a congested, narrow roadway owned, operated and maintained by the City of Azusa. Students frequently traveled this roadway against traffic due to a lack of bike paths, crosswalks and/or traffic signals that would allow students safe travel to and from classes and residence halls. The hazardous condition of the roadway was further exacerbated by the presence of parked cars that narrowed the usable surface of the street.

What’s more, the suit alleges the University failed to install crosswalks or traffic signals that would allow students to safely cross the busy roadway during peak times of the day when motor vehicle traffic was the most congested. In particular, because of the lack of crosswalks and traffic signals, bicyclists had no other choice but to travel head-on into oncoming traffic, versus with the flow of traffic, further increasing the roadway’s dangerous conditions.

Finally, the suit alleges the City of Azusa failed to provide its students with duty of due care by scheduling the location and times of its classes in a manner that increased traffic congestion and intensity along the roadway.

Azusa Pacific University Allegedly Failed to Improve Hazardous Road Conditions

According to the lawsuit, the defendants were aware of the dangerous conditions of the roadway due to increased serious and fatal car accidents and had been provided funding to make improvements to the roadway but instead, used these funds for other projects at the expense of public safety.

“We allege that not only did Azusa Pacific University use funds earmarked for roadway improvements for other unrelated projects, it failed to warn people about the dangers of this roadway which further demonstrates its negligent and reckless disregard for human safety,” said Chase.

The action seeks economic damages for severe personal injuries, pain and suffering and permanency, past and future hospital, medical and other healthcare expenses, and loss of past and future wages and earning capacity.

About BISNAR | CHASE

The BISNAR | CHASE Newport Beach personal injury lawyers represent people who have been very seriously injured or lost a family member due to an accident, defective product or negligence throughout California. The law firm has won a wide variety of challenging serious injury defective product cases against a number of Fortune 500 companies. Get a complimentary copy of The Seven Fatal Mistakes That Can Wreck Your California Personal Injury Claim. For more information, please visit http://www.CaliforniaInjuryBlog.com.

###






















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by - March 19, 2011 at 8:13 am

Categories: Personal Injury Lawyer   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

California Personal Injury Lawyers File Products Liability Injury Action Against Pepsi

California Personal Injury Lawyers File Products Liability Injury Action Against Pepsi













The Seven Fatal Mistakes
That Can Wreck Your
California Personal Injury Claim


Los Angeles, CA (Vocus) January 20, 2010

The California personal injury lawyers of BISNAR | CHASE (http://www.BestAttorney.com ) have filed a products liability injury lawsuit against Pepsico, Inc., The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Metal Container Corporation and New Albertson’s, Inc. The suit alleges that a Diet Pepsi can exploded in the hand of Lynda Ryan, causing the opening tab at the top of the can to break loose and fly at a high rate of speed into Ms. Ryan’s left eye, causing catastrophic damage to her eye resulting in essentially 100 percent vision loss. The action was brought against the aforementioned defendants by the plaintiff, Lynda Ryan.

Alleged Defective Pepsi Product Causes Severe Personal Injury

According to court records, Lynda Ryan purchased a 12-pack of Diet Pepsi from Albertson’s retail outlet in Blythe, California, several days before July 9, 2008 and placed the cans of soda in an ice chest in the back of her vehicle. Over the next few days, the plaintiff consumed most of the beverages without incident and without any indication there was a problem with the cans. On July 9, 2008, Lynda removed one of the three or four remaining cans of soda and, with a normal movement that did not involve excessive shaking or any other act that would cause the carbonated beverage inside to become excessively stimulated, she began to lift the pull tab to open the can. Before this movement was completed, however, the can exploded, causing the piece of the top which usually opens downward and stays attached to the can to instead break off and fly into Lynda’s left eye, causing traumatic eye injuries and resulting in essentially 100 percent loss of vision.

“We’re alleging that Pepsico, Inc., The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Metal Container Corporation and New Albertson’s, Inc. knew or should have known there were inherent vices and defects in the design and manufacturing of Pepsi’s containers,” said Brian Chase, California personal injury lawyer and partner at BISNAR | CHASE. “We allege that, in order to save money, the defendants used thinner and thinner thicknesses of the metal used to make the cans and top until it reached the point that the metal would unexpectedly break under normal pressure and usage by consumers, thereby putting profits over the safety of its customers.”    

Chase further alleges that each of the defendants in this case breached their duty of care by placing into the stream of commerce a defective and unsafe product for the use in which it was intended — a product that was dangerous to Ms. Ryan as well as consumers who would use it in a normal fashion.

Plaintiff Suffers Extreme Pain, Extensive Medical Procedures

As a result of this incident, Lynda Ryan suffered severe globe rupture, extensive corneal laceration, lens destruction, corectopia traumatic cataract, uveal prolapse, vitreous prolapse and corneoscleral rupture resulting in essentially 100 percent vision loss in her left eye. Lynda has undergone, and will continue to undergo, extensive necessary medical diagnosis and treatment procedures. What’s more, Ms. Ryan has suffered, and will continue to suffer, severe pain and mental suffering. “It’s not presently known whether the loss of Ms. Ryan’s vision will be permanent in whole or in part, and this will not be known until all necessary medical procedures have been substantially completed,” said Chase.

The action seeks economic damages for the catastrophic injuries sustained by Lynda Ryan, including ongoing medical costs and loss of income due to her injuries, and damages for her permanent pain, suffering, disfigurement and mental anguish. The lawsuit is pending in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case # YC058827.

About BISNAR | CHASE

The BISNAR | CHASE law firm’s personal injury lawyers represent people who have been very seriously injured or lost a family member due to an accident, defective product or negligence throughout California. The law firm has won a wide variety of challenging serious injury defective product cases against a number of Fortune 500 companies. For more information, please visit http://www.ProductDefectNewsAndAdviceBlog.com . Get a complimentary copy of The Seven Fatal Mistakes That Can Wreck Your California Personal Injury Claim.

Contact:

John Bisnar

BISNAR | CHASE Personal Injury Lawyers

1-800-561-4887

jbisnar(at)bestattorney(dot)com

###









Attachments


















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Related Personal Injury Lawyer Press Releases

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by - March 17, 2011 at 4:22 pm

Categories: Personal Injury Lawyer   Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Can my 17 yr old file a Civil Suit for Personal Injury?

Question by Obama eat my nuts!: Can my 17 yr old file a Civil Suit for Personal Injury?
I have tried contacting lawyers to help my 17 yr old son file a civil suit against a 19 yr old. But no lawyer wants to help because they do not think “They will get anything out of it” The 19 yr old was charged with a felony assult and battery “1st strike”. This creep outta the blue ran up on my son when my son was talking to another student and ran full force and punched him in the right side of the face, causing my sons cheek to shatter, my son had 3 plates placed in his face and still suffers from head achs and neausa. I know this kid may or may not have money, but for me it is the principle of the matter my son is damaged for life..my question is can we file a civil suit without a lawyer and be successful, if we have all our medical reports and the fact that the kid admitted he just it my son for the hell of it?

Best answer:

Answer by americanfreeman
1) You can file in small claims. Since he is a minor you file the suit.
2) If he has no money, what is the point.

No lawyers allowed in small claims.

What do you think? Answer below!

6 comments - What do you think?  Posted by - March 6, 2011 at 2:17 pm

Categories: Personal Injury Lawyer   Tags: , , , ,

California Personal Injury Lawyers File Lawsuit Against City of Mountain View, California, for Dangerous Conditions of Public Property





The Seven Fatal Mistakes That Can Wreck Your California Personal Injury Claim


Mountain View, CA (Vocus) March 17, 2010

The California personal injury lawyers of BISNAR | CHASE (www.BestAttorney.com)] have filed a lawsuit against the City of Mountain View, California, for dangerous conditions of public property. The lawsuit was filed after a June 2008 incident in which Randy Richards, a resident of Santa Clara County, California, sustained severe, permanent and disabling injuries when he was pinned between two vehicles on city property. The action was brought against the defendant by Randy and his mother, Martina Richards, who was witness to the incident. The lawsuit is pending in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, case #108CV131502.

Tragic Events Lead to Catastrophic Personal Injuries

According to court documents, on January 9, 2008, Randy was standing and working on a roadway in the City of Mountain View, just behind a lawfully parked pickup truck on Diericx Drive near Franklin Avenue. As he was loading the truck at the edge of the roadway, well out of the lane of travel for northbound vehicles, the driver of a car in the northbound lane suddenly lost control, veered into the lane toward the right, and collided with Randy and the parked pickup truck, pinning him between both vehicles.

In addition to severe emotional distress, Randy sustained catastrophic physical injuries , including the complete present and potential permanent loss of the use of his right leg, and its severe disfigurement and the future possibility of amputation. He also sustained the complete present and potential permanent loss of the use of his left leg and its severe disfigurement.

City of Mountain View Fails to Correct Dangerous Roadway Conditions

“Tragic as this incident is, what’s even more tragic is the negligence and careless disregard demonstrated by the City of Mountain View for not correcting dangerous roadway conditions that had existed for some time,” said Brian Chase, a partner at BISNAR | CHASE.

The suit alleges that the roadway where Randy was injured was wrought with a variety of dangers that created a substantial risk to him and to others who might use it for similar purposes. First, the presence of a concrete island in the center of the street narrowed the available path of travel for northbound cars, causing vehicles to veer further right than would normally be necessary. What’s more, pooled rainwater on the roadway due to inadequate drainage caused slick driving conditions near the area where Randy was injured. Additionally, the street was configured in such a way that it created the illusion there was more driving room than actually existed. And the City of Mountain View, after being aware of habitual speeding and resulting similar accidents in that area, did not adequately or effectively control the speed of vehicles using the northbound lane.

The action seeks economic damages for Randy’s severe and permanent bodily injuries and resulting permanent disabilities, past and future physical and mental pain and suffering, and past and future economic losses, as well as damages for Martina’s severe emotional distress after witnessing the collision and her son’s resulting injuries.

About BISNAR | CHASE

The BISNAR | CHASE Newport Beach personal injury lawyers represent people who have been very seriously injured or lost a family member due to an accident, defective product or negligence throughout California. The law firm has won a wide variety of challenging serious injury defective product cases against a number of Fortune 500 companies. Get a complimentary copy of The Seven Fatal Mistakes That Can Wreck Your California Personal Injury Claim. For more information, please visit www.ProductDefectNewsAndAdviceBlog.com.

# # #





More Personal Injury Lawyer Press Releases

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by - February 13, 2011 at 3:43 am

Categories: Personal Injury Lawyer   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Should I wait after my probation ends before my immigration lawyer can file my papers for a spousal petition?

Question by vincentpjimenez: Should I wait after my probation ends before my immigration lawyer can file my papers for a spousal petition?
My lawyers says i need to wait after my informal probation ends, then they can file the petition for me (I-130, I-485). I got married to my wife who is a US citizen and I was convicted of shoplifting on Jan 8, 2008. the 2 year informal probation ends on Jan 8, 2010, and my lawyer says that we should file the papers after Jan 8, 2010. Why are they delaying this? What problems might arise if I file the petition asap? I know there is a “petty offense exception” law and my case falls under this because it is a single offense, the maximum possible jail time was 6 months only, and I did not do actual jail time. Please advise I don’t want to waste money anymore. I have made a lot of consultations with different lawyers around 12 maybe and all of them say that its not a problem as long as its a single petty offense, and we just have to sign a waiver. But when I actually hired a lawyer, this lawyer all of a sudden told me to wait after my probation before they can file my papers to the INS. I will not be able to work for 1 year because I dont have a work permit, and my papers will definitely be delayed. I am thinking of getting another lawyer who is more specialized in this area and firing my current lawyer. My current lawyer says they can file it right now, but i will have to sign a waiver that if the outcome is bad (deportation) that they will not be responsible for it, because the lawyer can lose his license. Please advise.
I am here legally up until Jan 1, 2009, when my H-4 visa expired. I got arrested on Oct 25, 2007 while I was still in status.

Best answer:

Answer by Lawenforcer
Wow, is our system broke, you steal and stay….great!!!

Give your answer to this question below!

2 comments - What do you think?  Posted by - February 6, 2011 at 8:11 am

Categories: Immigration Lawyer   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

How to File For a Legal Separation

A legal separation is a viable option when marital problems arise.
Video Rating: 3 / 5

18 comments - What do you think?  Posted by - January 18, 2011 at 6:13 am

Categories: Legal Lawyer   Tags: , ,

Next Page »